<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Juliana Hatfield Might Be In Love: New England</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.magnetmagazine.com/2010/02/14/juliana-hatfield-might-be-in-love-new-england/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.magnetmagazine.com/2010/02/14/juliana-hatfield-might-be-in-love-new-england/</link>
	<description>Real Music Alternatives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:12:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Shimmed</title>
		<link>http://www.magnetmagazine.com/2010/02/14/juliana-hatfield-might-be-in-love-new-england/comment-page-1/#comment-41711</link>
		<dc:creator>Shimmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.magnetmagazine.com/?p=59333#comment-41711</guid>
		<description>Legalizing gay marriage is a good start, but still very exclusionary.  Why not allow marriage between three or more people for example?  It&#039;s also probably written in many texts that the Boston tea partiers were mere everyday citizens that simply objected to taxation without representation in the British government, but in reality they were probably affluent people who just didn&#039;t want to pay taxes under any circumstances.  Much like the so-called tea partiers of today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legalizing gay marriage is a good start, but still very exclusionary.  Why not allow marriage between three or more people for example?  It&#8217;s also probably written in many texts that the Boston tea partiers were mere everyday citizens that simply objected to taxation without representation in the British government, but in reality they were probably affluent people who just didn&#8217;t want to pay taxes under any circumstances.  Much like the so-called tea partiers of today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

