<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Power Pop: The ’90s, Attack Of The Clones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.magnetmagazine.com/2002/09/05/power-pop-the-%e2%80%9990s-attack-of-the-clones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.magnetmagazine.com/2002/09/05/power-pop-the-%e2%80%9990s-attack-of-the-clones/</link>
	<description>Real Music Alternatives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:58:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mistercharlie</title>
		<link>http://www.magnetmagazine.com/2002/09/05/power-pop-the-%e2%80%9990s-attack-of-the-clones/comment-page-1/#comment-7895</link>
		<dc:creator>mistercharlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.magnetmagazine.com/?p=28932#comment-7895</guid>
		<description>Part of the griping about lack of sales for &quot;power pop&quot; is that many of its proponents just don&#039;t write good songs.  They have all the trappings, stylistically, of the music they&#039;re inspired by or are trying to emulate (The Who Sells Out, or #1 Record, or whatever), with &quot;vintage&quot; gear, good drum fills or harmonies, but the songs just aren&#039;t there, both melodically or lyrically.  The truth is, in any genre, it&#039;s hard to write a great song.  And in a world where folks want to put themselves in a narrow Power Pop box, they often end up sounding like freshman college songwriting project submissions.

Not, of course, that a &quot;great&quot; song (it&#039;s all subjective of course) is a prerequisite for a hit.  Matthew Sweet said it best: maybe you should be a musician/songwriter because you HAVE TO, because you are compelled to, not because you want to.

And maybe, by the way, another problem isn&#039;t the music, it&#039;s the packaging, the label.  I didn&#039;t, for instance, hear anybody calling those coupla gigantic singles from that band Jet &quot;power pop&quot; songs, or crowing of a power pop revival, even though they could have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the griping about lack of sales for &#8220;power pop&#8221; is that many of its proponents just don&#8217;t write good songs.  They have all the trappings, stylistically, of the music they&#8217;re inspired by or are trying to emulate (The Who Sells Out, or #1 Record, or whatever), with &#8220;vintage&#8221; gear, good drum fills or harmonies, but the songs just aren&#8217;t there, both melodically or lyrically.  The truth is, in any genre, it&#8217;s hard to write a great song.  And in a world where folks want to put themselves in a narrow Power Pop box, they often end up sounding like freshman college songwriting project submissions.</p>
<p>Not, of course, that a &#8220;great&#8221; song (it&#8217;s all subjective of course) is a prerequisite for a hit.  Matthew Sweet said it best: maybe you should be a musician/songwriter because you HAVE TO, because you are compelled to, not because you want to.</p>
<p>And maybe, by the way, another problem isn&#8217;t the music, it&#8217;s the packaging, the label.  I didn&#8217;t, for instance, hear anybody calling those coupla gigantic singles from that band Jet &#8220;power pop&#8221; songs, or crowing of a power pop revival, even though they could have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
